Children with severe stroke may fare better if treatment includes mechanical clot removal

stroke

Serious disability was 6 times more likely to be the result three months after stroke among children whose clot-caused stroke in a large vessel (a type of ischemic stroke) was not treated with a procedure to extract the clot, according to preliminary late-breaking science presented today at the American Stroke Association’s International Stroke Conference 2022. The conference is a world premier meeting for researchers and clinicians dedicated to the science of stroke and brain health being held in person in New Orleans and virtually, Feb. 9-11, 2022.

Although stroke risk increases as people grow older, stroke can occur at any age.

This Australian study analyzed severe strokes in children that occurred in a large artery or blood vessel in the brain. The treatment for these types of large-vessel clots in adults may involve mechanical removal of the clot. In this procedure, also called endovascular therapy or mechanical thrombectomy, a tiny tube, or catheter, with a special clot-retrieving device on the end, is threaded through a blood vessel to remove the clot.

Although mechanical clot removal is known to improve stroke recovery in adults, children have not been included in previous research. This study compared post-stroke disability between children who received the procedure and those who did not to explore whether mechanical clot removal may be beneficial for children after severe stroke.

The study included 166 children (average age 6 years old; 65% boys) treated for stroke at different hospitals throughout New South Wales, Australia, from 2010 to 2019. Slightly less than one-quarter of the children (39) had a blockage in a large blood vessel, or a severe stroke, which is similar to the rate found in adults. Thirteen children with this type of stroke received mechanical blood-clot removal, while 26 did not.

The 26 children who did not receive mechanical blood-clot removal had greater physical disability compared to the other two groups: the 13 children who did receive mechanical thrombectomy, and 127 children whose stroke was not caused by a blockage in a large blood vessel. Specifically, researchers found:

  • Children with a large blood vessel blockage who did not receive blood-clot removal were 6 times more likely to have moderate to severe disability after three months compared to those who received the procedure.
  • Compared to children with an ischemic stroke that was not in a large vessel, children with a large blood vessel blockage who did not receive mechanical thrombectomy were more than 3.5 times more likely to have significantly worse outcomes at three months after the stroke.

“We were surprised by how common large vessel blockage is in children with stroke and how much worse the disabilities were among the children who did not receive mechanical clot removal, compared to those who did,” said lead researcher Kartik Bhatia, M.B.B.S., Ph.D., M.S., a pediatric interventional neuroradiologist at Sydney Children’s Hospital Network in Westmead, Australia. “Now that we know how poor recovery is for these children who did not receive endovascular therapy, it is much easier to justify treatment options like clot removal for children with a large blood vessel stroke.”

The study also found that about 80% of the children with a large vessel stroke, met the Australian and U.S. requirements—other than age—for adult eligibility for mechanical clot removal.

“Our health systems also need improvement so children with severe stroke are able to receive mechanical clot removal more easily,” Bhatia said. “These children should be offered treatments to clear the blockages, just like we offer for adults.”

The study had several limitations that may have affected the results, including that it is a retrospective study which relied on medical records to identify the levels of disability, and there was not a standard process of selection for treating patients.

Source: Read Full Article